Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 6.6 points higher (29.5 vs 22.9) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1965 vs $596; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.7 Max when you need intelligence above 22.9, and Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) when 22.9 is enough.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.9 | 29.5 | +28.8% Qwen3.7 Max is 28.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $596.33 | $1,964.83 | +229.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.29s | 16.53s | +8.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 8.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.60 / $2.70 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning): 28.8% more intelligence, 229.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill