o4-mini (High) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)

o4-mini (High) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

OpenAIo4-mini (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.70
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.8 27B (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
26.20
Total cost
$1060
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Metrico4-mini (High)Qwen3.8 27B (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)16.726.2+56.9% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 56.9% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,060.08— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.44s54.35s+91.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 91.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.10 / $4.40$0.50 / $3.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickero4-mini (High): what beats itQwen3.8 27B (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/o4-mini/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/o4-mini/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill