Phi-4 vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

Phi-4 vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MicrosoftPhi-4Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricPhi-4Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)5.97.2+22.0% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 22.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.44s104.13s+574.4% Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) is 574.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.13 / $0.50$0.24 / $0.54
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerPhi-4: what beats itQwen3 32B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/phi-4/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/phi-4/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill