Phi-4 vs Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)

Phi-4 vs Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MicrosoftPhi-4Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricPhi-4Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)5.913.1+122.0% Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) is 2.2× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.51s170.08s+996.6% Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) is 996.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.13 / $0.50$0.03 / $0.15
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerPhi-4: what beats itQwen3.5 4B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/phi-4/qwen3-5-4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/phi-4/qwen3-5-4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill