Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash

Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Qwen3.5 Omni Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3.5 Omni FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Qwen3.5 Omni FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.712.5−53.2% Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is 53.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.90s3.93s−75.3% Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is 75.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.11 / $0.33$0.10 / $0.80
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Speech, Video
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats itQwen3.5 Omni Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/qwen3-5-omni-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/qwen3-5-omni-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill