Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Qwen3 Coder Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 Coder NextOff the frontier
Intelligence
9.20
Total cost
$405
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Qwen3 Coder NextDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.79.2−65.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 65.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$405.10— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)16.26s6.22s−61.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 61.7% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.11 / $0.33$0.31 / $1.00
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats itQwen3 Coder Next: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill