Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Sarvam 105B (High)

Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Sarvam 105B (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
SarvamSarvam 105B (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Sarvam 105B (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.78.8−67.0% Sarvam 105B (High) is 67.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)17.13s14.46s−15.6% Sarvam 105B (High) is 15.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.11 / $0.33$0.04 / $0.17
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats itSarvam 105B (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/sarvam-105b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/sarvam-105b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill