Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
ByteDance SeedSeed-OSS-36B-InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Seed-OSS-36B-InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.712.1−54.7% Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct is 54.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)16.26s67.17s+313.1% Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct is 313.1% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.11 / $0.33$0.21 / $0.57
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats itSeed-OSS-36B-Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/seed-oss-36b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/seed-oss-36b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill