Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Step3 VL 10B

Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) vs Step3 VL 10B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
StepFunStep3 VL 10BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Step3 VL 10BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.77.7−71.2% Step3 VL 10B is 71.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)16.26sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.11 / $0.33—
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats itStep3 VL 10B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/step-3-vl-10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/quasar-438b/step-3-vl-10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill