Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Beam 1.0
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Beam 1.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 30.3 | +138.6% Beam 1.0 is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $318.73 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.18s | 8.02s | −74.3% Beam 1.0 is 74.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.23 / $2.30 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill