Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash

Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AlibabaQwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.00
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.5 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3 235B A22B 2507 InstructStep 3.5 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)12.016.6+38.3% Step 3.5 Flash is 38.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.44s18.34s+75.7% Step 3.5 Flash is 75.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.21 / $0.84$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct: what beats itStep 3.5 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill