Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)

Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.219.4+169.4% Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reas… is 2.7× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)89.78s11.78s−86.9% Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reas… is 86.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.24 / $0.54$0.30 / $2.40
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning/qwen3-5-27b-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning/qwen3-5-27b-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill