Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) vs Step 3.7 Flash

Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) vs Step 3.7 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AlibabaQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.20
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.7 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3 32B (Reasoning)Step 3.7 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.219.5+170.8% Step 3.7 Flash is 2.7× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)108.39s18.37s−83.1% Step 3.7 Flash is 83.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.24 / $0.54$0.20 / $1.15
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQwen3 32B (Reasoning): what beats itStep 3.7 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-32b-instruct-reasoning/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill