Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0

Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AlibabaQwen3 32B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.30
Total cost
-
ReflectionBeam 1.0Off the frontier
Intelligence
30.30
Total cost
$319
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3 32B (Non-reasoning)Beam 1.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.330.3+315.1% Beam 1.0 is 4.2× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$318.73— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.70s8.02s−17.3% Beam 1.0 is 17.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.15 / $0.60$0.40 / $1.20
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQwen3 32B (Non-reasoning): what beats itBeam 1.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-32b-instruct/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-32b-instruct/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill