Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba or Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) scores 12.0 points higher (27.6 vs 15.6) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1278 vs $661; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 27.6 | +76.9% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 76.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $661.29 | $1,277.59 | +93.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 93.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.22s | 55.72s | +162.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 162.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $3.20 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): 76.9% more intelligence, 93.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 162.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b/qwen3-8-27b-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b/qwen3-8-27b-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill