Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Beam 1.0
Beam 1.0 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning): 94.2% more intelligence, 51.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 30.3 | +94.2% Beam 1.0 is 94.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $661.29 | $318.73 | −51.8% Beam 1.0 is 51.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.74s | 7.58s | −65.1% Beam 1.0 is 65.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $3.20 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-122b-a10b/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill