Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning) vs Beam 1.0

Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning) vs Beam 1.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AlibabaQwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.90
Total cost
-
ReflectionBeam 1.0Off the frontier
Intelligence
30.30
Total cost
$319
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3.5 27B (Reasoning)Beam 1.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)22.930.3+32.3% Beam 1.0 is 32.3% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$318.73— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)37.95s8.02s−78.9% Beam 1.0 is 78.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $2.40$0.40 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQwen3.5 27B (Reasoning): what beats itBeam 1.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-27b/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-27b/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill