Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 11.1 points higher (29.5 vs 18.4) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $941; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.7 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.4 | 29.5 | +60.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 60.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $940.97 | $2,277.12 | +142.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 65.15s | 16.53s | −74.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 74.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.60 / $3.60 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning): 60.3% more intelligence, 142.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-397b-a17b/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-397b-a17b/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill