Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AlibabaQwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
10.80
Total cost
-
ReflectionBeam 1.0Off the frontier
Intelligence
30.30
Total cost
$319
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)Beam 1.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)10.830.3+180.6% Beam 1.0 is 2.8× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$318.73— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)45.93s8.02s−82.5% Beam 1.0 is 82.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.03 / $0.15$0.40 / $1.20
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning): what beats itBeam 1.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-4b-non-reasoning/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-4b-non-reasoning/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill