Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) by Alibaba or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) scores 3.4 points higher (11.2 vs 7.8) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($329 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.2 | 7.8 | −30.4% Solar Pro 3 is 30.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $328.86 | $159.22 | −51.6% Solar Pro 3 is 51.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 43.21s | 18.89s | −56.3% Solar Pro 3 is 56.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning): 30.4% less intelligence, 51.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-9b/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-5-9b/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill