Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) scores 12.3 points higher (33.7 vs 21.4) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1459 vs $1145; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.4 | 33.7 | +57.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 57.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,145.36 | $1,458.94 | +27.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 27.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 111.41s | 61.13s | −45.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 45.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.60 / $3.60 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning): 57.5% more intelligence, 27.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 45.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-27b/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-27b/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill