Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash

Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AlibabaQwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
21.40
Total cost
$1145
StepFunStep 3.5 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Step 3.5 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)21.416.6−22.4% Step 3.5 Flash is 22.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,145.36Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)112.14s20.68s−81.6% Step 3.5 Flash is 81.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.60 / $3.60$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQwen3.6 27B (Reasoning): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-27b/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-27b/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill