Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Step 3.7 Flash

Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Step 3.7 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AlibabaQwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
21.40
Total cost
$1145
StepFunStep 3.7 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
19.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Step 3.7 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)21.419.5−8.9% Step 3.7 Flash is 8.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,145.36Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)111.38s20.66s−81.5% Step 3.7 Flash is 81.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.60 / $3.60$0.20 / $1.15
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQwen3.6 27B (Reasoning): what beats itStep 3.7 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-27b/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-6-27b/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill