Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba or Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) scores 2.4 points higher (27.6 vs 25.2) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1165 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Plus | Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.2 | 27.6 | +9.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 9.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $427.73 | $1,165.00 | +172.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 2.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 45.52s | 56.53s | +24.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 24.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) vs Qwen3.7 Plus: 9.5% more intelligence, 172.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 27B (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-8-27b-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-8-27b-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill