Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3.7 Plus: 57.9% more intelligence, 15.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 10.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Plus | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.2 | 39.8 | +57.9% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 57.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $427.73 | $362.72 | −15.2% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 15.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 45.52s | 50.49s | +10.9% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 10.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill