Qwen3.7 Plus vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Qwen3.7 Plus | Step 3.5 Flash 2603 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.2 | 17.0 | −32.5% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 32.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $427.73 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 44.78s | 21.03s | −53.0% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 53.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.40 / $1.60 | $0.10 / $0.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-7-plus/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill