Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Step 5 Preview
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by Alibaba or Step 5 Preview by StepFun? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Step 5 Preview
Step 5 Preview vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: 9.5% more intelligence, 54.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Step 5 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.9 | 43.7 | +9.5% Step 5 Preview is 9.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,632.05 | $1,190.26 | −54.8% Step 5 Preview is 54.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 61.58s | 12.06s | −80.4% Step 5 Preview is 80.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $1.00 / $2.70 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Step 5 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BStep 5 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b/step-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b/step-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill