Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs Step 3.5 Flash

Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AlibabaQwen3.8 27B (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
26.20
Total cost
$1060
StepFunStep 3.5 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
16.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3.8 27B (Low)Step 3.5 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.216.6−36.6% Step 3.5 Flash is 36.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,060.08Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)55.56s18.34s−67.0% Step 3.5 Flash is 67.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.50 / $3.00$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQwen3.8 27B (Low): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b-low/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b-low/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill