Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) scores 11.0 points higher (20.2 vs 9.2) but costs 5.0× as much to run the benchmark ($2022 vs $405; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 9.2, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 9.2 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.2 | 9.2 | −54.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 54.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,022.49 | $405.10 | −80.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 80.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.99s | 6.21s | −55.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 55.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $3.00 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning): 54.5% less intelligence, 80.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill