Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh): 18.1% more intelligence, 72.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 39.8 | +18.1% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 18.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,336.09 | $362.72 | −72.9% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 72.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 60.71s | 50.19s | −17.3% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 17.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.50 / $3.00 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill