Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603

Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AlibabaQwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Off the frontier
Intelligence
33.70
Total cost
$1336
StepFunStep 3.5 Flash 2603Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Step 3.5 Flash 2603Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)33.717.0−49.6% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 49.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,336.09Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)59.47s20.05s−66.3% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 66.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.50 / $3.00$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQwen3.8 27B (Xhigh): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash 2603: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-27b/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill