Qwen3.8 Max vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 29.4 points higher (40.2 vs 10.8) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $233; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 Max | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.2 | 10.8 | −73.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 73.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,172.37 | $232.95 | −92.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 92.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 64.64s | 8.34s | −87.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 87.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Max: 73.1% less intelligence, 92.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Qwen3.8 MaxTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-max-0803/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-8-max-0803/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill