Qwen3 Coder Next vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 6.8 points higher (21.3 vs 14.5) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $158; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3 Coder Next when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder Next | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.3 | 14.5 | −31.9% Solar Pro 3 is 31.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.18 | $158.07 | −36.8% Solar Pro 3 is 36.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.28s | 21.31s | +303.6% Solar Pro 3 is 303.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.35 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3 Coder Next: 31.9% less intelligence, 36.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 303.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 51.80 for $72.0.
Qwen3 Coder NextSolar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill