Qwen3 Coder Next vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-31.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 6.8 points higher (21.3 vs 14.5) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $148; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3 Coder Next when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder Next | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.3 | 14.5 | −31.9% Solar Pro 3 is 31.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.18 | $147.93 | −40.9% Solar Pro 3 is 40.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.80s | 18.12s | +277.5% Solar Pro 3 is 277.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.35 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen3 Coder Next: 31.9% less intelligence, 40.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 277.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
Qwen3 Coder NextSolar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill