Qwen3 Coder Next vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-31.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Pro 4 scores 20.3 points higher (41.6 vs 21.3) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($380 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick Solar Pro 4 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Qwen3 Coder Next | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.3 | 41.6 | +95.3% Solar Pro 4 is 95.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.18 | $380.17 | +52.0% Solar Pro 4 is 52.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.80s | 58.55s | +1119.8% Solar Pro 4 is 1119.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.35 / $1.20 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Solar Pro 4 vs Qwen3 Coder Next: 95.3% more intelligence, 52.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1119.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
Qwen3 Coder NextSolar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-coder-next/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill