Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Beam 1.0
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Beam 1.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.6 | 30.3 | +215.6% Beam 1.0 is 3.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $318.73 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.57s | 7.79s | +70.5% Beam 1.0 is 70.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $1.10 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill