Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AlibabaQwen3 Omni 30B A3B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.00
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.5 Flash 2603Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricQwen3 Omni 30B A3B InstructStep 3.5 Flash 2603Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)6.017.0+183.3% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 2.8× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)7.06s20.05s+184.0% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 184.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.25 / $0.97$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, Image, Speech, VideoText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerQwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct: what beats itStep 3.5 Flash 2603: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill