Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)

By Anthropic · released 2025-05-22 (17 months) · snapshot 2026-10-24

Not ranked · benchmark data missingproprietary
Intelligence index
16.60
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)
$15.0 / $75.0
Better than…

Is Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) on the Pareto frontier, and what beats it?

Not ranked · benchmark data missing

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) does not report both selected axis metrics.

At a glance

Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) today

Context window200k
Input modalitiesText, Image
Not plotted

Incomplete benchmark data

Intelligence and benchmark cost are both required to place this model on the frontier. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Intelligence index
16.60
Benchmark cost
Not reported
Input / 1M tokens
15.00
Output / 1M tokens
75.00
Context window
200k

Intelligence: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Cost: total cost to run that benchmark, so reasoning tokens count. API id: claude-4-opus.

Matchup

Compare head to head

Suggested: what beats it, its effort levels, and frontier models near its price.

Deciding

Should you use Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)?

Should you use Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)?

No verdict: it does not report both intelligence and benchmark cost.

What is better and cheaper than Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning)?

Other models on the intelligence-vs-cost frontier

How much does Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) cost?

$15/$75 in/out per 1M tokens, and - to run the full Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, the honest all-in number for reasoning models.

Frontier membership by axis pair

Other axis pairs where Claude 4 Opus (Non-reasoning) is Pareto-optimal.

Y axisX axisOn the frontier
AA intelligence indexAA total cost to run (USD)no data
AA intelligence indexEnd-to-end total secondsno data
AA intelligence indexOutput speed tokens/secno data
Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/models/claude-4-opus · Markdown: /api/v1/models/claude-4-opus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill