Trinity Large Thinking
By Arcee AI · released 2026-04-01 (4 months) · snapshot 2026-08-07
- Intelligence index
- 18.40
- Price per 1M tokens (in / out)
- $0.23 / $0.88
- End-to-end time
- 13.4s
Is Trinity Large Thinking on the Pareto frontier, and what beats it?
Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Trinity Large Thinking does not report both selected axis metrics.
Open in the picker Daily check URL: 200 on the frontier, 409 once beaten
Trinity Large Thinking today
Incomplete benchmark data
Intelligence and benchmark cost are both required to place this model on the frontier. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
- Intelligence index
- 18.40
- Benchmark cost
- Not reported
- Input / 1M tokens
- 0.23
- Output / 1M tokens
- 0.88
- Context window
- Not reported
Intelligence: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Cost: total cost to run that benchmark, so reasoning tokens count. API id: trinity-large-thinking.
Compare head to head
Should you use Trinity Large Thinking?
Should you use Trinity Large Thinking?
No verdict: it does not report both intelligence and benchmark cost.
What is better and cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking?
Other models on the intelligence-vs-cost frontier
How much does Trinity Large Thinking cost?
$0.23/$0.88 in/out per 1M tokens, and - to run the full Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, the honest all-in number for reasoning models.
Frontier membership by axis pair
Other axis pairs where Trinity Large Thinking is Pareto-optimal.
| Y axis | X axis | On the frontier |
|---|---|---|
| AA intelligence index | AA total cost to run (USD) | no data |
| AA intelligence index | End-to-end total seconds | |
| AA intelligence index | Output speed tokens/sec |
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/models/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/models/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill