Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)
Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta | DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.2 | 13.7 | −61.1% DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-re… is 61.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.02s | 6.55s | −72.7% DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-re… is 72.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.56 / $1.68 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-beta/deepseek-v3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-beta/deepseek-v3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill