Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)

Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Sapiens AIAgnes 2.5 Pro BetaNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
35.20
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricAgnes 2.5 Pro BetaGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)35.214.9−57.7% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 57.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)24.02s19.63s−18.3% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 18.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.30$0.57 / $2.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta: what beats itGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-beta/glm-4-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-beta/glm-4-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill