Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallbac… scores 1.6 points higher (25.6 vs 24.0) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($499 vs $397; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallbac… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 25.6 | +6.7% Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Lo… is 6.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $499.20 | +25.8% Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Lo… is 25.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 5.93s | −50.9% Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Lo… is 50.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 6.7% more intelligence, 25.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 50.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/claude-sonnet-5-5-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/claude-sonnet-5-5-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill