Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta scores 17.8 points higher (24.0 vs 6.2) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($397 vs $224; both mid-range class). Pick Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 6.2 | −74.2% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 74.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $224.32 | −43.5% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 43.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 6.15s | −49.0% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 49.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.25 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 74.2% less intelligence, 43.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill