Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 36.0 points higher (60.0 vs 24.0) but costs 21× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $397; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 60.0 | +150.0% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $8,239.69 | +1976.3% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 21× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 104.19s | +763.2% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 763.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 150.0% more intelligence, 1976.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 763.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGemini 4 Carbon (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gemini-4-carbon · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gemini-4-carbon?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill