Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 28.5 points higher (52.5 vs 24.0) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($718 vs $397; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 52.5 | +118.8% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 2.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $717.71 | +80.9% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 80.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 123.38s | +922.2% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 922.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 118.8% more intelligence, 80.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 922.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill