Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) scores 27.3 points higher (51.3 vs 24.0) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($972 vs $397; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 51.3 | +113.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $972.34 | +145.0% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 311.89s | +2484.0% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 2484.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 113.8% more intelligence, 145.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2484.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaGPT-6.1 Terra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-6-1-terra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/gpt-6-1-terra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill