Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Inkling Small
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Inkling Small by Thinking Machines? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta scores 11.1 points higher (24.0 vs 12.9) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($397 vs $225; both mid-range class). Pick Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Inkling Small.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Inkling Small | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 12.9 | −46.3% Inkling Small is 46.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $224.77 | −43.4% Inkling Small is 43.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 31.55s | +161.4% Inkling Small is 161.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech |
Inkling Small vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 46.3% less intelligence, 43.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 161.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaInkling SmallToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/inkling-small · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/inkling-small?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill