Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Mistral Large 4 (High)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Mistral Large 4 (High) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 (High) scores 2.1 points higher (26.1 vs 24.0) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1360 vs $397; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 (High) when you need intelligence above 24.0, and Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta when 24.0 is enough.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Mistral Large 4 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 26.1 | +8.8% Mistral Large 4 (High) is 8.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $1,359.61 | +242.6% Mistral Large 4 (High) is 3.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 20.63s | +70.9% Mistral Large 4 (High) is 70.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 (High) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 8.8% more intelligence, 242.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Mistral Large 4 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaMistral Large 4 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill