Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 80.8% less intelligence, 178.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 4.6 | −80.8% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 80.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $1,103.02 | +178.0% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 2.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.07s | 16.93s | +40.3% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 40.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaMistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill