Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta by Sapiens AI or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta: 42.1% more intelligence, 75.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.0 | 34.1 | +42.1% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 42.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $396.84 | $95.73 | −75.9% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 75.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.50s | 9.48s | −17.6% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 17.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.30 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Agnes 2.5 Pro Theta is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaMuse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/agnes-2-5-pro-theta/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill